Allied Bombing Rotterdam Far Worse than German Attack

Civilian casualties bombing raids:

5 German attacks in May 1940: 600
600 Anglo attacks 1940-1945: 10,000

“Als gevolg van 5 Duitse bombardementen vielen tussen de 1000 en 1200 dodelijke slachtoffers. Het aantal burgerslachtoffers als gevolg van de ongeveer 600 geallieerde luchtaanvallen op Nederlands gebied, is een veelvoud daarvan; naar schatting omstreeks de 10.000 doden naast een veelvoud aan gewonden – dikwijls levenslang verminkt – en enorme materiële schade.”

Gedeelte uit de toespraak van NIOD-directeur J.C.H. Blom op 12 december 2004

Continue reading “Allied Bombing Rotterdam Far Worse than German Attack”

Britain Masterminded WW1

first-world-war-origins
[amazon.com]

The past two centuries have been the centuries of the dominance of Anglosphere, first the British empire and now the American empire. This is reflected in this overview of subsequent reserve currencies over the past six centuries, showing that every century has a new ‘top dog’ (Portugal, Spain, Holland, France, Britain, USA)…

Reserve Currency Status

Another indicator for the might of a political entity is the GDP, showing that China is well on its way to become the top dog of the 21st century and could replace the US, that in its turn began to replace the British Empire in the twenties:

fall-empires2
[Deutsche Bank]

But China is not of interest here, it is The Great War or First World War as it became known after World War Two. Most people, who are not professional historians paid by a government, will accept that history is written by the victors. Or that victors can enforce that the defeated party, in casu Germany, signs war guilt clauses, like happened in Versailles and Nuremberg.

So if the historical truth is generally distorted by the victor(s), what can be said now, one century later, about who was really responsible for the outbreak of World War One?

On the night of 30-31st of July, 1914, feeling entrapped by a seemingly inevitable march of events, the German Kaiser Wilhelm mused to himself doomily:

‘Frivolity and weakness are going to plunge the world into the most frightful war of which the ultimate object is the overthrow of Germany. For I no longer have any doubt that England, Russia and France have agreed among themselves – knowing that our treaty obligations compel us to support Austria – to use the Austro-Serb conflict as a pretext for waging a war of annihilation against us… In this way the stupidity and clumsiness of our ally [Austria] is turned into a noose. So the celebrated encirclement of Germany has finally become an accepted fact… The net has suddenly been closed over our heads, and the purely anti-German policy which England has been scornfully pursuing all over the world has won the most spectacular victory which we have proved ourselves powerless to prevent while they, having got us despite our struggles all alone into the net through our loyalty to Austria, proceed to throttle our political and economic existence. A magnificent achievement, which even those for whom it means disaster are bound to admire.’

The Kaiser was entirely correct.

Earlier this year we commemorated that 100 years ago World War One (WW1) broke out. Today no serious continental European historian will accept the victor’s verdict of Versailles: “Germany is guilty”. Instead the consensus is that the Great Powers ‘stumbled into war‘, ‘it was a chain reaction’ really, a mutual suicide, an ‘accumulation of misjudgments & shortsightedness’ that led to the disaster.

All rubbish.

The Scottish authors Gerry Docherty and James MacGregor in their new book have meticulously shown that WW1 was long planned in advance by Great-Britain. They debunk that Germany was to be blamed for the war. It was Great-Britain that managed to draw France and Russia into a coalition against Germany, with the sole purpose of conserving the preeminent position of the British empire, by destroying the rising power Germany. That truth can easily be distilled from the war aims of the parties involved:

  • Britain: wanted to destroy a rising Germany that was seen as a threat to the supremacy of the British Empire.
  • Russia: wanted to dominate Bulgaria and control the Bosporus
  • France: wanted German speaking Alsace-Lorraine back, lost in 1871
  • Germany: had no territorial or other aims other than to prevent becoming destroyed

Mastermind of World War One Britain managed to unite the ambitions mentioned above into a single coalition with the aim to destroy Germany. In the end they prevailed, because they could make a Balfour deal with the US ‘Zionist Lobby’ du jour: “we British give you Palestine, if you bring your Americans on our side into the war”. And not even that was enough to bring the Germans down. In the end they trusted the Americans (Wilson’s peace plan) and prematurely disarmed and that broke their backs.

The interpretation of history, the guardianship of history is presently owned by Anglosphere, because they have the power to do so, at the cost of continental Europe. But many, including us, foresee a rapid decline of US power in the coming years, offering the opportunity to correct the self-serving historic lies that define western culture of today and lay the foundation for a renaissance of European civilization, centered around the coming Paris-Berlin-Moscow confederation that will replace the dying West.

paris-berlin-moscou-transparent
Continue reading “Britain Masterminded WW1”

Nederland was niet neutraal in 1940 en kreeg wat het verdiende

Deze post is te belangrijk om de mogelijkheid open te laten dat die ooit in de “memory hole” zou kunnen verdwijnen.
In mei 1940 was Nederland was de agressor, niet Duitsland, doordat ze aktief meewerkte aan geallieerde plannen om Duitsland aan te vallen via Nederlands grondgebied.
Nederland verdiende wat het kreeg en liet Duitsland geen keus om zelf de eerste dreun uit te delen i.p.v. te wachten tot het zelf een dreun zou krijgen.
Dit patroon is trouwens identiek aan wat gebeurde in Polen, Noorwegen en Rusland-Brbarossa.
Die Duitse invallen hadden niet het motief om grondgebied in te lijven, maar was in alle gevallen een reactie op agressieve bedoelingen van de geallieerden.
Het wordt hoog tijd dat de waarheid aan het licht komt.

Bron

NEDERLAND WAS NIET NEUTRAAL.
16 OKTOBER 2015 GERARD DE BOER

Nadat Engeland en Frankrijk op 3 september 1939 aan Duitsland de oorlog hadden verklaard, werd het Nederlandse volk door de toenmalige regering middels een proclamatie in de Staatscourant wijsgemaakt dat Nederland strikt neutraal zou blijven.

Maar vanaf dat moment begon een intensieve samenwerking tussen de Britse Secret Intelligence Service (SIS) en de Nederlandse geheime dienst GSIII onder leiding van generaal-majoor J.W. van Oorschot. De Britse geheime dienst opereerde destijds uit een pand aan de Haagse Nieuwe Parklaan en Van Oorschot, die overigens getrouwd was met een Engelse vrouw, stond daar bekend als agent 969. In 1938 had hij ook al eens een hoge Britse onderscheiding gekregen.

Bij de Duitsers kwam de samenwerking tussen de Britse en Nederlandse geheime dienst pas goed aan het licht door het zogeheten ‘Venlo-incident’ in de nacht van 8 op 9 november 1939.

Tevens waren er contacten tussen de Nederlandse opperbevelhebber generaal Winkelman en de geallieerden. Hoewel de politiek zei te volharden in de ‘beproefde neutraliteit’ droeg Winkelman desondanks zijn attachés op contacten te leggen met de toekomstige bondgenoten. Vooral Frankrijk werd benaderd. Op 24 maart 1940 – dus ruim 6 weken voor de Duitse inval in Nederland – schreef Winkelman een memorandum aangaande de samenwerking tussen de Nederlandse, Belgische, Engelse en Franse legers.

En de marineleiding nam het intussen ook al niet zo nauw met de neutraliteit en voerde in het diepste geheim, besprekingen in Londen. Die geheime contacten waren gelegd door de chef van de marinestaf en tegelijk bevelhebber der zeestrijdkrachten, vice-admiraal J. Th. Fürstner. Hij zorgde er onder meer voor dat sommige marine-eenheden in de Nederlandse wateren begin 1940 een verzegelde envelop aan boord kregen met daarin speciale zeekaarten voor de evacuatieroutes naar Engeland, alsook gegevens over het herkenningssein van de Britse marine. Voorts bereidde Fürstner via de marine-attaché in Londen, luitenant-ter-zee eerste klasse A. de Booy, een directe radioverbinding voor tussen de marinestaf in Den Haag en de Admirality in Londen en regelde hij alvast het verschepen van de Nederlandse goudreserve naar Engeland, onder escorte van Britse oorlogsschepen. Al deze contacten hadden destijds de instemming van de ministers Van Kleffens (Buitenlandse Zaken) en Dijxhoorn (Defensie).

Zelfs oud-premier Colijn voerde in maart 1940 besprekingen met leden van het Britse oorlogskabinet, terwijl Engeland al een half jaar in oorlog was met Duitsland. In het ‘neutrale’ Nederland werd over dit bezoek zelfs helemaal niet geheimzinnig gedaan. Het stond in alle kranten.

Hieronder een document uit het Franse archief. Het betreft een brief van de Franse generaal Maurice Gamelin aan de toenmalige Franse minister van Oorlog Édouard Daladier d.d. 9 april 1940 over een plan voor een aanval op het Duitse Roergebied via België en Nederland. Het plan dateert dus één maand voor de Duitse inval in Nederland. In de brief staat onder meer te lezen: “Het binnenrukken in BELGIË is de beste voorbereiding voor ons binnenrukken in NEDERLAND, waarvoor het de eerste stap is”.

Aangezien de Franse aanval op het Duitse Roergebied dus ook over Nederlands grondgebied zou lopen, had de Nederlandse legerleiding aan de Fransen belangrijke informatie verstrekt voor hun gemotoriseerde eenheden. Dit betrof de exacte gegevens met betrekking tot de Nederlandse tankstations en tegoedbonnen waarmee ze konden tanken.
Nadat de Duitse geheime dienst door het decoderen van berichten op 6 en 7 mei 1940 tussen Londen en Parijs tot de slotsom was gekomen dat er hoogst waarschijnlijk ieder ogenblik een aanval via Nederland en België op het Duitse Roergebied te verwachten was, besloot de Duitse legerleiding de geallieerden voor te zijn door op 10 mei 1940 tot de aanval over te gaan. Hierbij moet opgemerkt worden dat op dat moment behalve de Franse divisies inmiddels ook al 10 Britse divisies van in totaal 394.000 man aan de Frans-Belgische grens lagen.

Op 10 mei 1940, om 06:00 uur in de ochtend, werd de Duitse oorlogsverklaring door de Duitse gezant Graf Zech von Burkensroda aan de Nederlandse minister van Buitenlandse Zaken Van Kleffens overhandigd met de volgende inhoud: “Wij hebben onweerlegbare bewijzen voor een onmiddellijk dreigende inval van Frankrijk en Engeland in België, Nederland en Luxemburg, die met medeweten van Nederland en België sinds lang was voorbereid, met het doel op het Roergebied een aanval te doen”.

Uiteindelijk moest in 1969 ook onze rijksgeschiedschrijver Loe de Jong schoorvoetend toegeven “dat Nederland niet zo neutraal was geweest”.

Gerard

John Wear on Germany’s War

Establishment historians characterize National Socialist Germany as a uniquely barbaric, vile and criminal regime that was totally responsible for starting World War II and carrying out some of the most heinous war crimes in world history. Germany’s War by John Wear refutes this characterization of Germany, bringing history into accord with the facts. Germany’s War documents that the Allied leaders of the Soviet Union, Great Britain and the United States were primarily responsible for starting and prolonging World War II-costing million of lives. Far from being the conqueror of Europe, Adolf Hitler saved it from Stalin. The leaders of Great Britain and America also adopted policies designed to force war with Germany. Britain’s unconditional guarantee to Poland led to horrific acts of violence against Poland’s ethnic Germans and, thus, Germany was forced to invade Poland to end these atrocities. Franklin Roosevelt’s numerous provocations, including a shoot-on-sight policy against German shipping and leaked plans of a U.S. invasion of Germany, forced Germany to declare war on the U.S. despite Hitler’s desire for peace. This book also reports the Allied mass murder of the German people after the end of World War II during which the Allies-led by General Dwight D. Eisenhower-murdered approximately 1.5 million German prisoners of war through intentional starvation and exposure to the elements. Probably a minimum 2.1 million ethnic Germans expelled from their homes also died in what was supposed to be an “orderly and humane” relocation. Finally, the Allies murdered millions of additional Germans through intentional starvation after the war ended-plus much, much more. Deluxe softcover, 508 pages, illustrated, 350+ bibliographical entries, 1,000+ index entries, 1,000+ footnotes

[amazon.com] – GERMANY’S WAR: The Origins, Aftermath & Atrocities of WW2 (2015)
[unz.com] – The book “Germany’s War” is online
[wearswar] – Wears War on the Lies, Liars & WW2
[inconvenienthistory.com] – Columnist John Wear
[barnesreview.org] – Why the Holocaust Story Was Invented
[russia-insider.com] – Germans Cut Through Red Army in 1941 Because Soviets Were Only Prepared to Attack

Die dreiste Fälschung

Amazon has deleted a book from its offerings and that is always a good sign to take note of the book. German revisionist historian Stefan Scheil has discovered a French book from the author Georges Demartial from 1928 about the events in 1914 and the attempts to falsify history by French officials in order to put the blame for WW1 on the Germans.

[pi-news.net] – Stefan Scheil – Amazons dreister Schachzug
[antaios.de] – Georges Demartial, Stefan Scheil – Die dreiste Fälschung

[documents1940] – The Truth Behind WW1

“Frivolity and weakness are going to plunge the world into the most frightful war of which the ultimate object is the overthrow of Germany. For I no longer have any doubt that England, Russia and France have agreed among themselves – knowing that our treaty obligations compel us to support Austria – to use the Austro-Serb conflict as a pretext for waging a war of annihilation against us… In this way the stupidity and clumsiness of our ally [Austria] is turned into a noose. So the celebrated encirclement of Germany has finally become an accepted fact… The net has suddenly been closed over our heads, and the purely anti-German policy which England has been scornfully pursuing all over the world has won the most spectacular victory which we have proved ourselves powerless to prevent while they, having got us despite our struggles all alone into the net through our loyalty to Austria, proceed to throttle our political and economic existence. A magnificent achievement, which even those for whom it means disaster are bound to admire.”

German Kaiser Wilhelm

Auschwitz Commander Hoess Testifies at Nuremberg

Note the headphones. They could have been used to instruct him what to say. The words come out in small portions with relatively long pauses, sufficiently long to receive the next batch of words, perhaps spoken by the German Jew and one of the masterminds of the trial Robert Kempner. Hoess was tortured in advance by the British Jew Bernard Clarke.


Rudolf Hoess at the mercy of Bernard Clarke.

What was WW2 anyway: a holocaust inflicted by the Germans on the Jews or a holocaust inflicted by the Jews on the Germans?

[avalon.law.yale.edu] – Nuremberg Trial Proceedings Volume 11, ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTH DAY – Monday, 15 April 1946 Morning Session
[rudolfhoess.wordpress] – The Torture and False Confession of Rudolf Höss
[ihr.org] – How the British Obtained the Confessions of Rudolf Höss
[furtherglory.wordpress] – Why did Rudolf Hoess confess? The British “took it out of him with torture” says his 80-year-old daughter
[ynetnews.com] – Daughter of Auschwitz commandant downplays Holocaust murders
[inconvenienthistory.com] – Mattogno – Commandant of Auschwitz – Rudolf Höss, His Torture and His Forced Confessions
[fpp.co.uk] – David Irving – Nuremberg, The Last Battle


The official death tally as compiled by the neutral Red Cross organisation, based on German records, including cause of death, usually typhus. Gassed: nobody. Nobody denies these figures. For the rest we have to believe Anglos and Soviets not to have lied in Nuremberg. Everybody knows that the Anglos and Soviets have never lied throughout their entire existence. The idea that the Alllies invented the Holocaust to create the moral patina as a justification for the establishment of their pre-planned new Europeans empires under immense human cost, must be dismissed as “anti-American” and “anti-Soviet” and we are all glad we are not like that. Seriously, in a democracy it is not allowed to break the law, like holocaust-denial laws. It is still very well allowed to protest against the existence of these laws under the motto “what do you have to hide, you leftist-globalist western lawmaker?” Expect the opportunity to overthrow these laws to rise after CW2.

The good news: The Anglo-Zionist nightmare is almost over.

[documents1940] – European-America is Over
[documents1940] – CW2 is brewing
[documents1940] – The Good News – ZOG Is Dying

German Media Lying About Anne Frank

[spiegel.de] – Anne-Frank-Übersetzerin “Ich mochte ihre Ehrlichkeit”


Yesterday (11 June, 2019), news moderator Claus Kleber did the same during prime time German news.

Except, Anne Frank was NOT killed by the Germans in 1945.

[wikipedia.org] – Anne Frank

In October or November 1944, Anne and her sister, Margot, were transferred from Auschwitz to Bergen-Belsen concentration camp, where they died (probably of typhus) a few months later. They were originally estimated by the Red Cross to have died in March, with Dutch authorities setting 31 March as their official date of death, but research by the Anne Frank House in 2015 suggests it is more likely that they died in February.

A good lawyer could even make the case that Anne Frank was indirectly killed by the Americans, who, in their fervor to colonize Germany and the rest of Europe, made conditions as miserable as possible for all civilians. The conditions in the camps were horrific during the collapse of German society at the end of the war. Anne Frank fled westwards from Auschwitz, with the Germans, making the existence of an extermination program doubtful.

Germans Prefer Eurasia Over America

According to an American-friendly source, the Atlantik-Bruecke (“Atlantic Bridge”), 85% of the Germans have negative views on America and little trust. Very few see a threat in Russia or China.

[atlantik-bruecke.org] – Vertrauen in der Krise
[rt.com] – Most Germans see relations with US as ‘negative,’ while less than 2% name Russia as threat
[wikipedia.org] – Atlantik-Brücke